Party With Mr. Dahmer
Spinmeisters should substitute 'Epstein' with 'Dahmer' to hear how they creepy sound
This Week In Blunders – Feb. 1-Feb 7
“I should never have been convicted of anything more serious than running a cemetery without a license.” – John Wayne Gacy
Billionaires, business magnates and politicians scrambled for cover this week as news organizations, legal experts and government officials sifted through the latest Epstein file release.
The biggest spin job of the week came from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
“It isn’t a crime to party with Mr. Epstein,” he said in an interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on Monday.
Indeed, guilt by association can lead to a miscarriage of justice. But allow me to offer a little thought experiment to put this in a better perspective: What if we substitute the name of Epstein with Dahmer?
Why are you partying with serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer?
You know. The guy who raped young men, drilled holes in their skulls, ate them, dismembered them, kept their body parts as trophies, dissolved their remains in acid-filled drums – and when he failed at turning them into sex zombies, he resorted to necrophilia. You know. That Jeffrey?
Why are you partying with him?
Perhaps it’s not an entirely fair comparison because as far as we know, Jeffrey Epstein only raped and trafficked children to some of the richest and most powerful people in the world. They only damaged their victims for life. They didn’t eat them.
