Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chinedu Okelikwu's avatar

Interesting!

Expand full comment
Terin Miller's avatar

I think business writers - and business publications generally - are eager to promote the 'Masters of the Universe' and 'wealth creators,' thinking or hoping some day that wealth might rub off on them, and not so eager or interested in exposing them as frauds or even doubting their words. Our old colleague John Carreyrou being an outstanding exception.

One only has to look at Deutsche Bank's loans to various questionable real estate 'developers,' based on what was proven to a jury of 12 tried and true citizens doing their civic duty, that were used as evidence in obtaining conviction on 34 counts of felony fraud.

I remember teachers and parents worrying about students not getting 'critical thinking' or 'problem solving' classes, when, as Boomers, we were raised to question authority and doubt everything that came from a single source.

Lie's book sounds like an invaluable resource, especially for business reporters with any interest in actually 'investigating' companies beyond reporting on their earnings and revenue.

Even the venerated Wall Street Journal rarely, if ever, notes for example a bank's capital-to-assets ratio, or even its Tier 1 capital, let alone its non-performing assets (more than 90 days past due) percentage to total assets. Just two more pieces of data that actually contain a whole lot more information about a bank's ability to withstand losses than it's 'provision for loan losses.'

Because, apparently, readers aren't interested in knowing the solvency of the banks, just how much money they make.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?