Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Counterfeit Scale's avatar

"Just Google him" assumes the buyer arrived with the dealer in their search frame. Most didn't. The art market's authentication ritual runs toward the work - certificates, provenance papers, foundation confirmations. The dealer earns a position inside the buyer's trust radius through gallery relationships and collector introductions. Background checks aren't part of the ritual.

His prior convictions were public record. The Britto injunction was public. The Peter Max prison term was public. The information was findable. What the market didn't require was finding it - because the verification structure was pointed at the paintings, not the person selling them.

The fake domain worked the same way. Buyers receiving a reply from andywarholfoundation.co were running a check on the work's legitimacy. The email was inside the frame they were already using. .co versus .org is easy to spot when you're suspicious of the sender. It disappears when the check is "did the Foundation respond?"

H. Craig Bradley's avatar

He also claimed to have studied at New York *Univeristy^spp. and trained at Sotheby’s. He actually attended the University of Miami for just two semesters, and NYU said it had no record of him attending, according to published reports.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?